Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers |
> $ ocaml > Objective Caml version 3.06 > > # Printf.printf "%08X\n" (1 lsl 30);; > C0000000 > > I expected output of 40000000, not C0000000. Note that this isn't a case > of simple sign extension, as the second example demonstrates. Where'd the > extra bit come from? As Yutaka Oiwa said, it comes from the conversion from Caml 31-bit integers to C 32-bit integers, which performs sign extension. Even though 0x40000000 and 0xC0000000 denote the same Caml int, I agree this behavior is very surprising and should be fixed. I'll look into this. Thanks for reporting the issue. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners