English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml popularity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-03-19 (20:52)
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlopt speed (was Re: Module recursion)

Last useless-numbers post...

>are quite different than the other machine I originally tested on (desktop 
>with slow cpu, fast hard drive, or I made a mistake on that machine, which 
>is more than possible).  I will retime things there as well when I go to 
>the office.

The answer is I must have been smoking crack the first time I timed things, 
because this desktop machine has msvc6 @ 15sec, ocamlopt @ 25sec, 
ocamlopt.opt @ 10sec.  It is a wider gap msvc6 vs. ocamlopt (~3x), but I 
still obviously made a mistake or was sloppy, and still .opt makes a big 
difference on my code.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners