Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-03-28 (05:35)
From: David Brown <caml-list@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:33:56AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote:

> This is my suggestion: use a minor backward compatible 
> syntax extension to allow for namespace use.
> >Are there any other options?  Did I get all of that right?
> Not that I know of.

Leave the module syntax alone, and just modify the compiler a little bit
to allow submodules to exist in separate files.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: