On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:33:56AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote:

> This is my suggestion: use a minor backward compatible 
> syntax extension to allow for namespace use.
> 
> >Are there any other options?  Did I get all of that right?
> 
> Not that I know of.

Leave the module syntax alone, and just modify the compiler a little bit
to allow submodules to exist in separate files.

Dave

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners