Browse thread
[Caml-list] DFT in OCaml vs. C
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] DFT in OCaml vs. C |
Markus Mottl wrote: >On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Issac Trotts wrote: > > >>The results on my 1 GHZ Pentium III Linux box: >> >>C: >>real 0m21.273s >>user 0m21.200s >>sys 0m0.040s >> >>OCaml: >>real 1m51.602s >>user 1m47.020s >>sys 0m0.260s >> >> > >Well, another insignificant benchmark... ;-) > >My timings on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium IV using GCC 2.95.4 and the latest >CVS-checkout of OCaml: > >C: >real 0m24.920s >user 0m24.900s >sys 0m0.020s > >OCaml: >real 0m30.397s >user 0m30.390s >sys 0m0.000s > >The difference you have observed on your machine is most likely due to >cache effects and possibly also due to compiler differences (GCC version). > Probably, but the C version doesn't seem as sensitive to these things. Issac ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners