Browse thread
[Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk |
I think this thread is a misunderstanding masquerading as an argument. Alex, I think people (well, I do at least :) want to hear what the differences between a namespace and the module system are. It seems on the face of it that fixing pack's implementation would solve the namespace problem (this was Sven's thought as well), but you don't think so (or think it's the wrong way to fix it), and I'd like to understand why, since you've obviously thought about it a bunch. Thanks, Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners