English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-03-26 (19:13)
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk

I think this thread is a misunderstanding masquerading as an argument.

Alex, I think people (well, I do at least :) want to hear what the 
differences between a namespace and the module system are.  It seems on the 
face of it that fixing pack's implementation would solve the namespace 
problem (this was Sven's thought as well), but you don't think so (or think 
it's the wrong way to fix it), and I'd like to understand why, since you've 
obviously thought about it a bunch.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners