English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Unix.lseek versus Pervasives.pos
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-03-19 (20:27)
From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unix.lseek versus Pervasives.pos
> It would seem to me that it would be convenient to have 64 bit versions 
> of seek_in, seek_out, pos_in, pos_out in the Pervasives module. This 
> would help decouple the Pervasives I/O module a little more from the 
> Unix module.

You wish was granted in OCaml 3.05 and 3.06: module Pervasives.LargeFile.

And, yes, not mixing Pervasives I/O with Unix I/O is recommended,
unless you enjoy puzzles :-)

- Xavier Leroy

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners