Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yutaka OIWA <oiwa@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers |
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:19:16 -0600 (CST), Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com> said:
Brian> $ ocaml
Brian> Objective Caml version 3.06
Brian> # Printf.printf "%08X\n" (1 lsl 30);;
Brian> C0000000
Brian> - : unit = ()
Brian> # Printf.printf "%010X\n" (1 lsl 30);;
Brian> 00C0000000
Brian> - : unit = ()
Brian> #
Brian> I expected output of 40000000, not C0000000. Note that this isn't a case
Brian> of simple sign extension, as the second example demonstrates. Where'd the
Brian> extra bit come from?
Brian> Brian
The extra bit comes from sign extension: (1 lsl 30) is the minimal
negative Caml integer. The cause exists in byterun/ints.c:
31bit-value 0x40000000 is sign-extended to 32bit C-integer 0xc0000000
by macro Long_val, then sprintf in the C library puts extra "00" in
front of it (equivalent to zero-extension).
Maybe the unsigned version of Long_val is needed.
# 1 lsl 30 - 1;;
- : int = 1073741823
# Printf.sprintf "%u" (1 lsl 30);;
- : string = "3221225472"
--
Yutaka Oiwa Yonezawa Lab., Dept. of Computer Science,
Graduate School of Information Sci. & Tech., Univ. of Tokyo.
<oiwa@yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, <yutaka@oiwa.shibuya.tokyo.jp>
PGP fingerprint = C9 8D 5C B8 86 ED D8 07 EA 59 34 D8 F4 65 53 61
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners