Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity
- isaac gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | isaac gouy <igouy@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity |
Why isn't X more popular? Why isn't X mainstream? Such fascinating questions! The many answers often have as much to do with the specific history of a language, as they do with language features or design. Then there's philosophy- 'There are many ways of trying to understand programs. People often rely too much on one way, which is called "debugging" and consists of running a partly-understood program to see if it does what you expected. Another way, which ML advocates, is to install some means of understanding in the very programs themselves.' Robin Milner, preface to The Little MLer. It's the immediate-gratification of getting "something" to work (and then making it the "right something") versus the deferred-pleasure of knowing that you will have a "correct" program. best wishes, Isaac __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners