English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml popularity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christian Lindig <lindig@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] monads for dummies
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:03:19PM -0800, james woodyatt wrote:
> If what I've written isn't very helpful to you, then please tell me so 
> I know not to try to explain this stuff to people.  On the other hand, 
> if it *is* helpful, that would be nice to know too.

I have some experience with the state monad but your article has sparked
my interest for the continuation monad that you explained. I would have
liked at least one example that uses some data, not just functions.

Since you seem to have quite some experience with monads, is performance
a problem? I would expect that the strict evaluation of OCaml leads to
an enormous numbers of closures in a monadic programming style,
something that might not happen in Haskell. For the same reason the
combinator style that is so poular in Haskell seems not very popular in
OCaml. The standard library not even defines a function composition
operator.

-- Christian