Browse thread
[Caml-list] Checked exceptions and type inference
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@q...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Checked exceptions and type inference |
Reading LtU I came across this article: http://www.octopull.demon.co.uk/java/ExceptionalJava.html Java treats checked exceptions as part of the type signature of the function. As such, it seems to me that as such, type inference would work to propogate most of this information in a more convient way. Checked exceptions actually have their uses, for "errors" which are not very exceptional. Out of memory is highly unexpected. End of file isn't quite as surprising. Not_found is another that shouldn't be that surprising- although that leads to a different religous war. Is there any research on using checked exceptions in an ML derived language? Any plans/opinions on implementing checked exceptions in Ocaml? Brian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners