Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml popularity
-
Graham Guttocks
- Gerd Stolpmann
-
Nicolas Cannasse
-
Pierre Weis
- Guillaume Marceau
- Graham Guttocks
-
Tushar Samant
- Andreas.Eder@t...
- Fred Yankowski
-
Pierre Weis
- Martin Weber
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andreas.Eder@t... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity |
Tushar Samant writes: > A Dummies > book abandons the responsibility of being truthful all the time, > and hence manages to communicate with harried, seat of the pants > programmers. You know that it's just this type--myself included-- > which stands the most to benefit from a safe fast language. I think dumbing down is not the right way (c) to go. It would be far better to try to educate the harried, seat of the pants programmer, than to cater to his perceived needs. There are already too many of this kind and we definitely need better educated programmers; and I mean educated, not trained! 'Andreas -- Wherever I lay my .emacs, there´s my $HOME. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners