English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml popularity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Markus Mottl <markus@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Haskell-like syntax
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Max Kirillov wrote:
> Just imagine -- it the third millenium, compiling the "best language",
> we need carefully order the .cmo files. Doing this also would push the
> "mutually recursive modules" problem.

Things are not this easy: the order is actually required for linking,
not for compiling (as long as you provide explicit signatures in
.mli-files).  The order during linking determines in which order side
effects will be caused when values are initialized, which only the user
can know. Furthermore, the "mutually recursive modules"-problem is more
of a typing problem than one of compilation.

Regards,
Markus Mottl

-- 
Markus Mottl                                             markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence                  http://www.oefai.at/~markus

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners