Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml popularity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-03-12 (16:58)
From: Graham Guttocks <graham_guttocks@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity
Pierre Weis <> wrote:
> This may be the main drawback of Objective Caml: there is no
> ``Objective Caml for dummies''. That may be the price to pay to use
> a powerful and theoretically well-founded language.

Do you mean that such a book could not be written, or simply that it
just has not been written yet?  I personally would like to see an
``Objective Caml for dummies'' as the available introductory material
(in English) is pretty poor IMO.

> learning Caml is indeed profitable to the way you deal with
> programming problems, but on the other hand, yes, it is not so easy

In you said:

``Caml is a programming language, easy to learn, easy to use''.

So is it easy or not easy?

Graham - Yahoo! Mobile
- Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: