Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Karl Zilles <zilles@1...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity |
Daniel M. Albro wrote: > imperative side of the language will get fleshed out a bit with some > expanded loop features like break statements, You can always implement a break statement as an exception: exception Break;; try for i = 1 to 10 do if i == 5 then raise Break done with Break -> ();; As an exception, you could (if you wanted) include special case handling for the break, or create a more aptly named exception and pass through data. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners