Browse thread
[Caml-list] GC and preventing data relocation
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] GC and preventing data relocation |
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 04:16 PM, Markus Mottl wrote: > Since there is no way for me to tell the C-library to continue with a > new location of the string, I'd like to know whether there is any way > to prevent the GC from moving specific data? In the current implementation (and in the foreseeable future), if your string is in the major heap, then only the compactor can move it. You could try to disable the automatic compaction (by setting max_overhead to 1 million) during the callback, restoring the original setting when you get out of the callback. You'll have to tell your users that they must not call Gc.compact nor change max_overhead during the execution of the callback function. You will also have to correctly manage the case where the callback function raises an exception... If the string is in the minor heap, you know it's a short string and you can (for example) copy it into a buffer pre-allocated in the C heap. -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners