Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternative proposal: COAN
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Michal Moskal <malekith@p...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: hierarchical modules
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:09:14PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > I prefer specifying the container module name on the command line or
> > adding a "package" declaration to the source file as in Java.
> Well, that would be necessary to address your point 1, and would also
> remove the dependency on the GNU binutils tools (for ocamlopt -pack).
> The one drawback of this approach is that compiled files thus
> "pre-packed" could not be linked or loaded in the toplevel, only the
> packed container would be; that might make testing a bit harder.

IMHO not linking all modules packed with -pack when only one of them is
referenced is much more important. At least until we'll have shared

: Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/ :  GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept :  {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: