Browse thread
[Caml-list] Looking for a real array
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Hal Daume III <hdaume@I...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array |
> to use the Bigarray module unless you need very large arrays. Normal > float arrays, too, are unboxed, but only when the compiler can infer at > compile time that they are guaranteed to be float arrays. Does this also apply if I have an abstract type defined in another module: > type foo = float and then have a foo array? - Hal ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners