Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@tiscali.be> writes:

...
> Otherwise, one must define a basic set of facilities that each basic
> database interface (perl DBD) must provide and use dynamic loading to
> a common DBI module.  So, in my opinion, the first thing to do is any
> case is
>
>   agree on a general database interface.

With perl, there were a few different DBI-type things and the others
fell into disuse.  So I'm not sure that agreement is necessary so much
as a really good (stable, simple, general, well-documented)
implementation.

> Are there people interested on this list?  

Sure.  No telling when I'll want to use a database from ocaml, but
when I do, it would be nice if I don't have to tie myself to one
particular db.

-- 
--Ed L Cashin            |   PGP public key:
  ecashin@uga.edu        |   http://noserose.net/e/pgp/

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners