Browse thread
[Caml-list] mystified by typing of optional arguments
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Eric C. Cooper <ecc@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] mystified by typing of optional arguments |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Francois Rouaix wrote: > The following example mystifies me > > let f ?opt x = > match opt with > | None -> x > | Some dx -> x + dx > > let g x = x + 1 > > let h1 = function > | 0 -> [g] > | _ -> [f; g] > > > let h2 = function > | _ -> [f; g] > > > h1 is typable but not h2. > Why is that ? Even simpler: [g; f] type-checks, but [f; g] does not. -- Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners