Archives of the Caml mailing list > Message from David Brown

Browse thread

[Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers

Brian Hurt
- Claude Marche
- Yutaka OIWA
- Xavier Leroy
  - Brian Hurt
    - Xavier Leroy
      - David Brown
      - tim@f...
        
        Brian Hurt
        
        Ville-Pertti Keinonen
        
        Brian Hurt
        
        Ville-Pertti Keinonen
        
        Brian Hurt
        
        tim@f...
        
        Ville-Pertti Keinonen
        
        Andreas Rossberg
        
        Ville-Pertti Keinonen
      - Ville-Pertti Keinonen
    - Ville-Pertti Keinonen

Date:	-- (:)
From:	David Brown <caml-list@d...>
Subject:	Re: [Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:

> > Or, I suppose, we could 
> > completely redesign Ocaml to use 32-bit ints and do something else to 
> > differentiate ints from pointers :-).
> 
> If you can find a "something else" that is faster than systematically
> boxing the 32-bit ints, you'll be hailed as the savior in compiler
> circles :-)

Easy, just convince everyone to start using 33 bit computers.

Dave

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners