Browse thread
[Caml-list] Feature request.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Lukasz Lew <ll189417@z...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Feature request |
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 Alain.Frisch@ens.fr wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Lukasz Lew wrote: > > I found that it would be usefull if some of the language constructions > > could be made localy. For example "open ... in" or "type ... in". > > Why "open in" isn't in standard parser? > > > > Why some constructions are restricted to global (module) use? > > Local modules can help you ! > > ... Yes, this all looks very nice, and even will be usefull for me, but i ask: Why it isn't built in? I mean: is there any reason (performance propably) for treating some constructinons diffrently. There is global "let ident = expr " and local "let ident = expr in" There is global "type ident = typedef" and no local pair. Local modules are fine, but they are not so user friendly. -- Lukasz Lew ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners