Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Our shrinking Humps
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Our shrinking Humps
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:06:28PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote:
> 50 cm away from the machine you are logged in!)). By the way, there is
> no ``Joe Random Ocaml Developer'' here: we will give accounts to
> selected people only (trusted people I would say).

Thanks for the clear explanation. The remaining quid is to better define
the concept of "trusted people" :)

Here at university of Bologna we are used to give "guest" accounts to
people that accept to subscribe an "assumption of responsibilities" (I
hope this is a correct english translation) for action performed with
their guest account. Do you use a similar approach at INRIA?

> Do you think this would be a reasonable solution ? Are there problems
> I do not imagine ?

No, it seems a reasonable given that "trusted people" are enough to
maintain the project.


Stefano Zacchiroli  --  Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{,,}  -
"  I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!  " -- G.Romney

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: