Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Easy solution in OCaml?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | isaac gouy <igouy@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Easy solution in OCaml? |
As-far-as-I-can-tell the current version, Clean 2.0.2, seems to be more capable than whichever version of Clean is being discussed here- Siegfried Gonzi wrote: > Clean or OCaml where you would have to re-write all > your functions because the structure of your > return-list has changed Existential Types in Clean 2.0.2 seem designed to deal with exactly this issue? Page 92 of "Functional Programming in Clean". Markus Mottl wrote: > I actually find it strange that there is no such > thing like if-then-else in Clean. if-then-else is described on p35 of "Functional Programming in Clean". Available from http://www.cs.kun.nl/~clean/contents/Clean_Book/clean_book.html best wishes, Isaac __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners