Does anyone know if there's any hope of getting RES or a RES-like
library into the standard distribution?  Resizeable arrays seem like a
pretty essential data structure, and the fact that you can't implement
them nicely without breaking the standard compiler abstractions (due to
the dummy value issue) argues in favor of including it in the
distribution, I would think.

Yaron

On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 05:12, Markus Mottl wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2003, Wheeler Ruml wrote:
> > I saw Brian's recommendation of a priority queue, but wanted to
> > mention that a resizable array would do here as well.
> 
> The RES-library implements everything you need for that purpose and also
> matches the signature of ordinary arrays:
> 
>   http://www.oefai.at/~markus/home/ocaml_sources.html#RES
> 
> Regards,
> Markus Mottl
-- 
|--------/            Yaron M. Minsky              \--------|
|--------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|

Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916 (new key as of Dec 4th)
Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners