Browse thread
[Caml-list] Looking for a real array
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Hal Daume III wrote: > > to use the Bigarray module unless you need very large arrays. Normal > > float arrays, too, are unboxed, but only when the compiler can infer at > > compile time that they are guaranteed to be float arrays. > > Does this also apply if I have an abstract type defined in another module: > > > type foo = float > > and then have a foo array? No, because the compiler cannot see then that it is a float when the type is abstract. Internally (in the module implementation) however, the compiler may well use unboxed foo arrays. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners