Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers |
Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote: > > One way of doing this much faster is just having a the first word of any > mixed block (homogenous blocks aren't a problem) indicate the number of > pointers and always put the pointers first. I'm afraid such a scheme is incompatible with polymorphism, where a slot may or may not be a pointer, depending on the actual instantiation. Still, polymorphic code must be able to operate uniformingly in both cases, i.e. the slot may not be shuffled around. - Andreas -- Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we would all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills, and listening to repetitive electronic music." - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners