Browse thread
[Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug? Printf, %X and negative numbers |
> For structures 32 words or less, you can do it like (using x86 assembly > language here): ...actual code snipped... Ok, that's not necessarily too bad. I guess I was just intuitively dismissing anything that felt like it had more than a couple of instructions of "overhead". I'm probably also biased by SMP-thinking - read-modify-write operations feel inherently evil. ;-) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners