Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] single-line comment request
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@q...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] single-line comment request
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Jeff Henrikson wrote:

> Though I favor the addition of the single line comments, most of the 
> comments thus far seem to be very subjective.  I find the "80+ percent 
> of comments in the existing sources are single line comment" fairly 
> weighty.  I also find the following unmentioned idea significant: 
> single line comments save large number of keystrokes when substituting 
> different chunks of code during testing.  Also adding printfs.  And any 
> comment-compile-uncomment-compile situation.  It's a fairly specific 
> task, but also a pronounced difference when it happens.

Actually, I was about to use this as an argument for why multi-line 
comments are better.  I do this a lot- comment out huge swaths of code, 
and then uncomment it one function at a time.  I do this by moving the (* 
around.  Very fast.  Very simple.  Simply dd on the line with the (*, page 
or arrow down to the next break point, and do a p.  

> I find a lot of the "no-single-comment" arguments to be sounding 
> remarkably reductionist in the way the "we don't need GUI" arguments 
> that certain die hard UNIX users purvey.  

Oh don't be silly.  Of course we need a GUI- so we can multiple xterms on 
the same screen!  :-)

A more legitimate analogy would be not needing both a mouse and a 
trackball.  You know- some people prefer mice, and others track balls, and 
sometimes it's more easy to use one than the other, so we really need 


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: