Browse thread
[Caml-list] Looking for a real array
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Eray Ozkural wrote: > Thanks to Brian Hurt and David Gurr who wrote off-the list that bigarrays > would work for me. It looks like Bigarrays can do unboxed arrays of integers. Normal arrays always use unboxed (tagged) integers so there is no need to use the Bigarray module unless you need very large arrays. Normal float arrays, too, are unboxed, but only when the compiler can infer at compile time that they are guaranteed to be float arrays. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners