Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Looking for a real array
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-04-29 (10:52)
From: Markus Mottl <markus@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Thanks to Brian Hurt and David Gurr who wrote off-the list that bigarrays 
> would work for me. It looks like Bigarrays can do unboxed arrays of integers.

Normal arrays always use unboxed (tagged) integers so there is no need
to use the Bigarray module unless you need very large arrays. Normal
float arrays, too, are unboxed, but only when the compiler can infer at
compile time that they are guaranteed to be float arrays.

Markus Mottl

Markus Mottl

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: