Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] labltk vs lablgtk
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Eric C. Cooper <ecc@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] labltk vs lablgtk
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Henri Dubois-Ferriere wrote:
> [...] i'm wondering what are the broad pros/cons between labltk and
> lablgtk?  does anything stick out as being specific to one or the
> other?

Very subjectively, I found that labltk was simpler to code, at least
for simple GUIs.  The appearance is fairly clean and attractive
(especially if you override the default fonts), but looks somewhat
out-of-place in a more modern desktop environment.

I found lablgtk more complex to code, but it is more flexible and has
a richer set of ready-made components.  It is very attractive, and
(obviously) fits in well on a Gnome desktop.

-- 
Eric C. Cooper          e c c @ c m u . e d u

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners