Browse thread
[Caml-list] Efficiency of 'a list
-
Eray Ozkural
-
Mattias Waldau
- Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Vitaly Lugovsky
- Eray Ozkural
- Lauri Alanko
-
Mattias Waldau
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ed L Cashin <ecashin@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Efficiency of 'a list |
Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@exomi.com> writes: >> Witness the linux kernel, which uses lists when lists are the most >> natrural, efficient data structure for the task at hand. > > Or not. Witness the long-lived O(n) scheduler... And I hope you > don't include pre-1.0 versions, which were algorithmically...shocking > beyond belief. > > And this despite the fact that based on his rants, Linus apparently > hates all cache-trashing pointer chasing (and Lisp, and garbage > collection etc.). I'm not going to be dragged into a linux advocacy argument. It suffices to say: Lists are useful data structures, but there's no getting around the need to know what you're doing. Enough said. At least this is my last contribution to this thread. -- --Ed L Cashin PGP public key: http://noserose.net/e/pgp/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners