Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ed L Cashin <ecashin@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects |
Lex Stein <stein@eecs.harvard.edu> writes: > You are missing the point. It is not true that building a program > requires full recompilation. The point that Prof. Hickey made was > that a program requires full recompilation if you make a change then > build *native* code. I've never used ocamlc -- I have no reason to, so I tend to think of ocamlopt as the ocaml compiler. Ideally, ocamlc and ocamlopt would be equally flexible. It never occurred to me that I'd have to create a more complex makefile just to get real separate compilation during development by using ocamlc, doing ocamlopt only at the end. -- --Ed L Cashin PGP public key: http://noserose.net/e/pgp/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners