English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-05-18 (19:08)
From: Ed L Cashin <ecashin@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
Lex Stein <stein@eecs.harvard.edu> writes:

> You are missing the point. It is not true that building a program
> requires full recompilation. The point that Prof. Hickey made was
> that a program requires full recompilation if you make a change then
> build *native* code.

I've never used ocamlc -- I have no reason to, so I tend to think of
ocamlopt as the ocaml compiler.  Ideally, ocamlc and ocamlopt would be
equally flexible.  

It never occurred to me that I'd have to create a more complex
makefile just to get real separate compilation during development by
using ocamlc, doing ocamlopt only at the end.  

--Ed L Cashin     PGP public key: http://noserose.net/e/pgp/

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners