Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David Brown <caml-list@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 10:32:54PM -0700, Chris Hecker wrote:
> >One issue to be aware of: if you build native code, when you change a 
> >module, then all dependent modules must be recompiled.  This can be 
> >surprising when a small change to a utility module causes a near full 
> >recompile of the project.  The byte-code compiler does not have this 
> >issue, and is sufficient for testing in most cases.
> Uh, isn't this a major flaw in the compiler?  Why does this happen?  This 
> seems like a vital part of scaling native code projects that's broken...I 
> was certainly counting on it working correctly quite soon.

Inlining.  Inlining is an important optimization, especially for
functional languages, where many functions are typically short.

However, inlinign causes a dependency on the bodies that are being

These dependencies are correctly displayed by ocamldep, though.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: