Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Performance problem
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Michal Moskal <malekith@p...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Performance problem
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:57:51AM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > > 2) there are no problems using bytecode :
> > >      0.3s using bytecode
> > >      23s  using native
> This I doubt very much, and indeed a quick test shows that bytecode
> and native take exactly the same time.  This isn't surprising:
> since 99% of the time is spent is the regexp engine, and this engine
> is in C, it runs at the same speed in bytecode and in native-code.

I have no idea *why* but here (Linux, x86), using ocamlc and ocamlopt
3.06, I get exactly the same timings (i.e. 0.44s for bytecode and 21.91s
for native code). No special options (like -p or -g) were used for

Does the bytecode and nativecode use *exectly* the same C engine (i.e.
maybe one is compiled with different options (like -fpic -O2 or
someting) ?)

: Michal Moskal :: : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: