Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph? |
> SML has a kind of operator overloading, but I don't know the details. They're overloaded up to the point of type inference, after which they become integer operations. I think it's better not to have something as inconsistent as SML. This works: - op +; val it = fn : int * int -> int - op + (1.0, 2.0); val it = 3.0 : real This doesn't: - val myadd = op +; val myadd = fn : int * int -> int - myadd (1.0, 2.0); ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners