Browse thread
[Caml-list] Efficiency of 'a list
-
Eray Ozkural
- Mattias Waldau
- Lauri Alanko
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <Diego-Olivier.FERNANDEZ-PONS@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Two types of efficiency (Was Efficiency of 'a list) |
Bonjour,
> Languages like PHP have more advanced built-in datastructures with
> language syntax to support them. In Ocaml, we can create the same
> program, however, there is no syntax support, and we have to add
> declarations like
>
> module StringSet = Set.Make(struct
> type t = string
> let compare = compare
> end) ;;
>
You should not use a set of strings but a trie. There are of course a
lot of ways to implement tries :
- trees of lists
- trees of arrays (or an optimized version with strings)
- ternary trees (balanced or not)
You may even minimize your acyclic automaton using any of the
following algorithms :
- 2 phases algorithm (cf Dominique Revuz PhD thesis)
- Incremental minimization (Incremental construction of a minimal
acyclic finite state automata, Daciuk, Milhov, B. Watson, R. Watson,
Computer linguistics volume 26 number 1 mars 2000)
- minimization by Brzozowki's algorithm
- minimization by Hopcroft's algorithm
For which one of these versions should Caml provide build-in support ?
Diego Olivier
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners