Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ed L Cashin <ecashin@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects |
John Carr <jfc@MIT.EDU> writes: >> Don't people consider separate compilation and the ability to change >> implementation without complete project recompiles a fundamental >> requirement of non-toy languages? > > Ten or fifteen years ago (when building a large project took a day of > compile time, and building the complete OS took several days) I would > have answered "yes". > > Now it is an important feature but not an essential feature. Working with an O.S. kernel or mozilla on a one-year-old PC reminds me that it still essential for some projects. -- --Ed L Cashin PGP public key: http://noserose.net/e/pgp/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners