Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oleg Trott <oleg_trott@c...> |
| Subject: | easy print and read (was: [Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph?) |
On Monday 02 June 2003 11:25 pm, John Max Skaller wrote: > Another needed overload is 'print' (to print some > representation of a value which might be used in > a diagnostic). I don't think simple overloading will solve the print/read issue to my personal satisfaction. In G'Caml, one will still have to define these functions by hand, right? As someone said, "I object to doing what computers can do". -- Oleg Trott <oleg_trott@columbia.edu> ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners