[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Why no 'step' in for loops? |
Am I missing something? for i = 0 to 100 step 10 ... I know I can emulate it my having another let-binding inside the loop, but that's just ugly and hard to debug. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Red Hat Inc. (London) and Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ http://www.annexia.org/ Freshmeat projects: http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj MONOLITH is an advanced framework for writing web applications in C, easier than using Perl & Java, much faster and smaller, reusable widget-based arch, database-backed, discussion, chat, calendaring: http://www.annexia.org/freeware/monolith/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners