Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed that there are some disparities in the way string are
> converted to int/float :
> 
>         Objective Caml version 3.06+36 (2003-06-19)
> 
> # int_of_string "34\000xx";;
> - : int = 34
> # float_of_string "34\000xx";;
> Exception: Failure "float_of_string".
> 
> Is this intentional?  I suppose it is not and float_of_string does the
> right thing.

And, BTW, I find the next unsafe behaviour very annoying, especially
when reading text files (while I was still innocent, I got hit):

# int_of_string "9876543210" ;;
- : int = -860875030

# int_of_float 9876543210.0;;
- : int = -860875030

Since OCaml aims to be safe, and since IMO adding an overflow check to
int_of_string & relatives would not be costly (relatively speaking), I
think it should be done. We could add unsafe_int_of_string-like functions
for speed afficionados.

Frédéric vdP

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners