Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] syntax of private constructors in CVS version
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntax of private constructors in CVS version

[Excellent rationale for private types snipped.]

>In contrast with abstract data types, the private types still maintain
>the elegant pattern matching facility of ML outside the module that
>defines the type.

So, when do we get views to solve this problem for abstract types?  If 
pattern matching is so great (which it is) it seems a crime to not allow it 
on abstract types (another great feature).  To make an american candy joke, 
peanut butter and chocolate taste great together!


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: