[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | MikhailFedotov <mikhail@k...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Why no 'step' in for loops? |
Hi! > Am I missing something? > > for i = 0 to 100 step 10 ... > > I know I can emulate it my having another let-binding inside > the loop, but that's just ugly and hard to debug. If your worries are about uglyness, then tail-recursive functions are more expressive. Mikhail ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners