Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Type safe affectation ?
- Gregory Morrisett
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gregory Morrisett <jgm@C...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Type safe affectation ? |
> > Perhaps, but it's easy for a compiler to offer support > > for "tail-allocation" > Does this also solve the construction of structure with loop ? (the > other case were affectation is needed ? No, not really. The TAL approach would handle this. But then so would using an option ref. I'd hate to see the external language changed with that kind of ugliness. -Greg ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners