Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] 'should have type unit' warning in 'let _ =' ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] 'should have type unit' warning in 'let _ =' ?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:04:36AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> By the way, there is a reason "let _ =" produces no warning: this is
> the only way to do a partial application without warning.
> "expr; ..." and even "ignore (expr); ..." will produce a warning.

Interesting ... what's the use of a partial application which is
then ignored?


Richard Jones.
Merjis Ltd. - all your business data are belong to you.
 All new technology is irrelevant until it is taken up by the public.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: