[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Clearwater <chris@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Functor implementation |
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:01:32PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote: > Now, let me warn you about the following code: > > > let compare x y = > let cmp = x - y in if cmp > 0 then GT else if cmp < 0 then LT else EQ > > which doesn't work if x and y are sufficiently far apart > (e.g. x = max_int and y = min_int). > > - Xavier Leroy Ahh, thanks, functors now fit nicely in my head. And yeah that cmp function was kind of braindead. I dont know why I didnt simply write it as : let cmp x y = if x > y then GT else if x < y then LT else EQ. But it would still be nice if the built in comparison function returned a sum type. And there was provided a helper function: let comparison_of_int x = if x > 0 then GT else if x < 0 then LT else EQ. Maybe "ordering" is a more appropriate name. Also, true and false appear to be a sum type: type bool = True | False, except you can't have lower case constructor names. Does this signal the fact that there is some kind of limitation with having primitive sum types? ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners