Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] CTAN/CPAN for Caml (COCAN ...?)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: BdB <>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] licensing (was Re: GODI (was: CTAN/CPAN for Caml (COCAN ...?)))
> > Not that I think that we should take over development of O'CaML, but
> > the "-pack" option does not seem to help avoiding nameclash and I
> > don't want to just complain about it...
> You are actually not permitted by the license to "take over
> development of O'CaML".  In practice, this means that it is indeed
> very important what the INRIA folks think about any given issue.

The community always has the ability to distribute patches.

I just don't think the community should try to think about major language
modifications on its own, not because of licensing, but because we just
won't be good at this.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: