Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Unix.kill on Win32
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] static class member....
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:12:24AM -0700, brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote:
> Yes, it says in the language introduction (the part on objects) 
> 
> 	Let-bindings within class definitions are evaluated before the object 
> 	is constructed

Well I take it back. And I must admit that I always have used
let-bindings as if they are local to the instance.

The question though is why does my example work? Is this a bug
in the compiler?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you.
 All new technology is irrelevant until it is taken up by the public.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners