Browse thread
[Caml-list] Unix.kill on Win32
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] static class member.... |
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:12:24AM -0700, brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote: > Yes, it says in the language introduction (the part on objects) > > Let-bindings within class definitions are evaluated before the object > is constructed Well I take it back. And I must admit that I always have used let-bindings as if they are local to the instance. The question though is why does my example work? Is this a bug in the compiler? Rich. -- Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you. All new technology is irrelevant until it is taken up by the public. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners