Browse thread
[Caml-list] Unix.kill on Win32
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@k...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] static class member.... |
From: brogoff@speakeasy.net > A non-orthogonality of the let within a class is that let module isn't > permitted. Is there any reason it isn't? This is indeed unfortunate, and I've wished for its presence several times. I don't think there is a theoretical reason. However the typing of classes being done in several passes, this would be much more difficult to implement correctly than the let module inside usual expressions. Jacques Garrigue ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners